Underwater digital cameras
Quick Links
Best Compact cameras for underwater photography
dSLR cameras Underwater Housing reviews
Choosing the best underwater digital camera can be difficult, even with an underwater camera guide.
The digital revolution opened up a brave new world for underwater photographers. Underwater digital cameras allow us to immediately see the results of our photos, and share them with our friends when we get home. Very few users of film have tried an underwater digital camera and not switched.
Compacts vs. dSLR cameras for underwater photography
Which type of underwater digital camera should you buy? There are compact cameras, and dSLRs.
After shooting with a compact underwater camera, many people consider switching to a dSLR. The obvious advantages are lens choices with superior optics and different focal lengths, better image quality from a larger sensor and reduced shutter lag and focus delays. These are huge advantages, and shooting with a dSLR is quite a joy. Very few people regret changing. However, a compact camera in the right hands can sometimes take shots that rival a dSLR shot, and the dSLR advantages of shutter lag and focus delay can be less important with non-moving subjects.
The largest difference between a compact camera, and a dSLR camera, is that a dSLR can take different lenses, while a compact camera has one attached lens. This is a very big difference that limits the flexibility of a compact camera, although wet lenses can help bridge this distance to some extent.
Let's look more advantages and disadvantages of a compact camera, when compared to a dSLR:
Compact underwater camera advantages:
- Smaller size for travel
- Less drag underwater
- Ability to change lenses underwater (Wet lenses)
- Much less cost (although the cost of a high-end housing, wet lenses, adapters, etc. can start to add up)
- Less weight, easier to carry and beach dive with
- Shoots video underwater, although the Nikon D90, Canon 5DMkII and others now do video
- With wet lenses, you can shoot macro, Wide-angle, and video all in 1 dive
Compact underwater camera disadvantages:
- Smaller sensor (more noise, smaller dynamic range, etc.)
- Increased shutter delay and focus delay over a dSLR - this is the biggest complain of many people
- Optics are a lesser quality
- Less choices for good quality lenses
- Only a couple models can shoot in raw and use a true fisheye lens
- Very slow raw write speeds, if raw is offered - although this has improved in a couple recent models
- Less battery life
- Noisy at high ISO's, although high ISO has limited use underwater, so this is not a big factor.
- Less control over depth of field. A larger-sensor dSLR will have a smaller depth of field at a large aperture, giving a blurred background that is difficult to accomplish with a compact camera.
For more information on how compacts differ from dSLR's underwater, and how to use your compact camera underwater, read about using compact cameras underwater.
What to look for in a compact underwater digital camera:
- Full manual mode available - I think this is fairly important
- Good quality UW housing available
- Close macro mode, although this is less important if you are going to use wet lenses
- Ability to take wet lenses, macro & wide angle
- Ability to take a fisheye lens. This can be important for people who want to shoot wide angle, because really great WA photos means getting really close, and the best way to do that is with the INON fisheye lens. Not many cameras, however, support full manual mode and accept a fisheye wet lens.
- Low shutter lag
- Long battery life
- Ability to view histogram
- Ability to manual white balance
- Raw mode. This is only important if you plan on shooting in RAW, it's nice to have this, but not everyone will shoot in raw. And if you don't have the right settings and the right lens, then having RAW won't matter anyways.
- Ability to fire strobes via sync cord. This is helpful because some otherwise you must use the camera's pop-up flash, which can be slow to recycle and use up battery time. However, sync cords can be a pain, so if you can find a fiber-optic solution that has decent battery life, and a decent recycle time on the internal flash, this is the way to go .
- Good auto focus capability. Some cameras are very slow to focus in less than ideal conditions, which is what we often experience underwater. All compacts come up short in this category usually.
- It should be easy to adjust the aperture and shutter speed UW. Some housings make it very difficult to use the full manual controls
Is full manual mode important in a compact camera?
Anyone considering purchasing an external strobe at some point, should get a camera with full manual controls, imho.
Most of the time, but especially when using an external strobe, it is very helpful to have complete control over how much ambient light comes into the camera. Although exposure compensation can be used to accomplish this to a limited degree, setting the shutter speed and aperture yourself is the best way to control the ambient light.
Compact digital underwater camera choices
Top Recommendations for underwater use
What are the best point and shoot cameras for underwater photography?
A few of my top underwater camera recommendations are the Canon A570, Canon S90, Olympus 5050 (I know, it's old), Olympus SP350, and Canon G9, Canon G10 & G11 and Panasonic Lumix LX3. If raw is not important, you might want to look at the new Canon SD990 (IXUS 980). Read more to find out pros and cons about each camera. My recommendations do not take into consideration the topside uses and features of these cameras, but you will probably weight those also. For an inexpensive new camera, I'd look at the Fuji F200EXR with a fuji housing.
All compacts involve tradeoffs. Here is a look at some choices, and their limitations. One thing to know about compact cameras in that newer models are not necessarily better. Some older models are excellent choices. Manufacturers are taking away compact camera features in order to increase their dSLR sales.
If you just want to take snapshots underwater, well then there are dozens of cameras that will all produce similar results. Most of the Fuji, Canon or Olympus cameras will be excellent choices. The cameras I list below are the best ones I feel for underwater photography, especially if you ever want to grow past taking a few snapshots.
Notes on individual underwater compact cameras
Here's some quick notes on some camera models. If the camera you are looking at is not on this list, it is probably because I think there is a better option on this list. This is especially true of the dozen's of Canon models.
Fuji E900 - good choice; cons - strobe can't be fired by sync cable; a little slow between shots in raw mode; can't take a sync cord
Oly 8080 - good choice; raw, good battery life, TTL & sync cord connection avail with Ikelite housing. 3 seconds between shots. no fisheye capability, auto focus a little slow
Oly 5050/5060 - very old camera, but excellent optics and capabilities; some pros believe this was the best compact camera for UW photography ever made. I have to warn you though, it has a long focus/shutter delay compared to recent compacts; no fisheye capability, but takes a WA lens. The oly 5050 has a much better lens. The best photos I've ever seen from compacts are from an Oly 5050. The prints look spectacular.
Olympus SP350 – good choice - shoots raw, but very slow. long lag between shots. Must go through menu to switch to macro mode. short battery life. Good photo quality. takes fisheye and macro lenses
Olympus 1030 SW, 1030SW - no manual controls, no manual white balance, no raw. Internal flash can't be used in super macro mode. good points are that it's waterproof to 33ft. Not a great choice. Could be good for snorkeling, kayaking, etc. without a housing.
Olympus FE-360 - no manual controls or white balance, poor topside reviews, skip it!
Olympus SP590 - no housing available, too long of a zoom lens
Fuji f30/f40, Fuji F50fd/f60 - good optics & video, great quality OEM housing from Fuji; downside - no raw or manual modes
Fuji F60 + ikelite housing - still waiting for more details on this setup. no raw mode
Fuji F200EXR - looks like a nice camera, no raw, but full manual controls (although only 2 aperture settings), and a good-quality fuji housing is available. A great point and shoot choice. Camera+ housing available for $440 (July 2009).
Sealife – often sold by dive shops, always sold as a camera/housing combination.
S&S DX-1G – I don't think the earlier or less expensive S&S compacts were very good, but many people now like the DX-1G. the DX-1G uses a Ricoh GX100 inside; low focus/shutter lag, raw mode, very close macro focus, full manual; wider than most compacts at 24mm; competitor to the Canon G9/G10; cons - fiber optic only, and it only takes S&S wet lenses. there is no fisheye option.
S&S DX-2G - comes out in April 2009. Similar to the DX-1G, uses a Ricoh GX200 inside. It is believed that the GX200 will not work inside the DX-1G housing. Supposedly the time in between shots when shooting RAW has been improved, and it has a larger LCD screen. A short review is here.
Three of the best choices out there might be the Canon A570, or the Canon G9/G10.
Canon A570
Great choice overall, at a great price point. The strobe can't be fired by sync cable; raw allowed by software update only; decent battery life. Takes a fisheye lens, and macro lenses.
The Canon A570 will do raw, with a software download called the “raw hack”. This software update has been used my many people successfully, does not cause problems, and adds many other useful features. See this site for more details.
http://scratchpad.wikia.com/wiki/CHDK
Image quality is excellent. The camera will work well with INON fisheye and macro lenses. full manual model is available.
Canon A620, Canon A710is, Canon A720
All are great little compact cameras, a couple years old but they take great photos, have full manual controls and great macro modes. They are great when combined with a wet wide-angle lens. Try to get the used camera + used housing at a bargain price. Almost as good as the Canon A570, but these won't take the Inon Fisheye lens
Canon SD990 / IXUS 980
I just found out about this camera in early 2009. It was released at the end of 2008. It's an ultra-compact, full manual controls, 14.7meg, and it takes an INON fisheye lens with the canon housing. Top-side reviews are great. There is no raw support or raw hack at this moment. Lens is 36-133mm. This camera might turn out to be a top underwater choice, but I have some more investigation to do. I've heard setting the aperture / shutter speed can be a little difficult. The image quality looks excellent based on the underwater images I've seen. My friend is producing some great wide-angle photos with the fisheye lens. $310 in the USA.
Canon S90 - released aug 2009, it will be great for UW use. Has RAW, full manual controls. Some housings will take add-on lenses. I tried this camera out topside recently, it was easy to use, photos looked great and I loved the large LCD. Has great potential. Housings are out from Canon, Ikelite, and Fisheye. Read my writeup on the camera and the different Canon S90 underwater housings.
Canon G9
Excellent macro and supermacro shots have been produced from the G9. Read my Canon G9 underwater housing reviews.
Canon G10 – shoots at 28mm; Canon, Ikelite, Patima and Fisheye (FIX) all make housings for the G10, some of which may support a WA lens. The fisheye housing is $999, at the high-end for a compact camera. Same TTL limitations as the Canon G9. The G10 is generally considered the best topside compact camera out there, but it has limitations underwater, depending on the housing. Read my Canon G10 underwater housing reviews.
Canon G11 - recently released in Aug 2009, looks similar to Canon G10. 10 megapixel sensor means larger pixel size than the G10, which is probably a good thing. Housings are coming out in late 2009 from Canon, Ikelite, and Fisheye.
Canon SX1 IS - RAW, full manual, HD video but 28-560mm zoom range means wet lenses won't work well.
Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX3 – shoots Raw; widest compact at 24mm, has full manual controls. Considered a top-quality compact. $399 new. The housings are by 10bar or UK-Germany. Strobes can fire via sync cord or fiber optics. I've seen great wide-angle photos with the INON UWL-100 wet lens and the INON dome port (giving you a 130 degree field of view), in the 10-bar housing. Also with the INON macro lenses. This camera has great potential, and Edvin Eng is producing some great photography with this setup. See my Panasonic Lumix LX3 10bar underwater housing review.
Nikon P6000 – shoots raw, manual controls, TTL with Ikelite housing.. not rated as good as a Canon or the LX3 though. The consensus is get a Canon g9 or g10 instead.
Nikon Coolpix L18 - poor choice, no close focusing, poor shutter lag, no manual controls or white balance
Nikon Coolpix L20 - similar to the L18 above, closer macro focusing but same cons, doesn't look like a good choice
Here is a good review comparing the canon g10, Nikon p6000, and Panasonic lumix lx3. It’s a topside review, but still useful I believe.
http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/cameras/pocket-battleships.shtml
http://www.bythom.com/compactchallenge.htm
|
Camera
|
Price, mar 2009
|
Manual mode?
|
Housing manufacturers
|
Min focus distance
|
Focal length
|
Takes WA lens? (2)
|
Battery life (1)
|
Histo gram?
|
Man. White bal.?
|
Raw mode
|
Raw recycle speed
|
Has hot shoe?
|
Mega pixels
|
Approx. Sensor size
|
Image quality (1)
|
Notes
|
|
Oly 8080
|
200 on ebay
|
Yes
|
Oly, Ikelite
|
2 inches
|
28-140mm
|
No
|
3 dives
|
yes
|
yes
|
Yes
|
3-5 sec
|
Yes
|
8meg
|
8.8mm
|
Good
|
|
|
Oly 5050
|
233 on ebay
|
Yes
|
Oly, ike
|
1 inch
|
35-105mm
|
Yes, 128
|
Very good
|
yes
|
yes
|
yes
|
4-5 sec
|
yes
|
5meg
|
7.2mm
|
Excellent
|
Faster lens than 5060.
|
|
Oly 5060
|
200 ebay
|
Yes
|
Oly,ike
|
1 inch
|
27-110mm
|
Yes, 150
|
Very good
|
yes
|
yes
|
Yes
|
4-5 sec
|
Yes
|
5meg
|
7.2mm
|
|
|
|
Oly sp350
|
205 on ebay
|
Yes
|
Oly, ike
|
1 inch
|
28-105mm
|
Fisheye, 165
|
Good, 2-3 dives
|
yes
|
yes
|
Yes
|
slow
|
yes
|
8meg
|
7.6mm
|
Good
|
Can’t use flash with oly housing
|
|
Canon S80
|
185 on ebay
|
Yes
|
Canon, ike
|
1.6 inches
|
28-105mm
|
Yes |
Ok 1-2 dives
|
Yes
|
yes
|
No
|
|
no
|
8meg
|
7.2mm
|
|
Manual settings can be difficult to use, they are in the menu
|
|
Canon S90
|
430
|
Yes
|
Canon, ike
|
2 inches
|
28-105mm
|
Yes |
Ok 1-2 dives
|
Yes
|
yes
|
Yes
|
??
|
no
|
10meg
|
7.6mm
|
Very good
|
Good UW choice. F2.0 lens is nice
|
|
Canon a570
|
100 on PG
|
Yes
|
Canon
|
2 inches
|
35-140mm
|
Fisheye
|
2 dives
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
With hack
|
|
No
|
7meg
|
5.8mm
|
|
|
|
Canon g9
|
350 used
|
Yes
|
Canon, ike, patima
|
½ inch
|
35-210mm
|
yes
|
|
yes
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
|
Yes
|
12meg
|
7.6mm
|
Very Good
|
No add-on lenses with canon housing (4),(6)
|
|
Canon g10
|
400 new
|
Yes
|
Canon, ike, patima, fisheye
|
½ inch
|
28-140mm
|
Read notes (3)
|
Good
|
Yes
|
yes
|
Yes
|
|
Yes
|
14.7 meg
|
7.6mm
|
Very Good
|
See notes (5)
|
|
Canon G11
|
500
|
Yes
|
Canon, ike, fisheye
|
1/3 inch
|
28-140mm
|
Read notes (3) |
Good
|
Yes
|
yes
|
Yes
|
|
Yes
|
10 meg
|
7.6mm
|
Very Good
|
See notes (5)
|
|
Fuji E900
|
200 PG
|
Yes
|
Fuji, ike
|
3 inches
|
32-128mm
|
Fisheye
|
1-2 dives (10)
|
yes
|
yes
|
Yes
|
Slow
|
No
|
9 meg
|
7.6mm
|
Good
|
|
|
Fuji f30
|
|
A/P
|
Fuji, ike
|
2 inches
|
35-105mm
|
Fisheye
|
Good
|
no
|
yes
|
No
|
|
No
|
6 meg
|
7.6mm
|
Good
|
Good high ISO, very small
|
|
Fuji f60
|
200 google
|
A/P
|
Fuji, ike
|
3 inches
|
35-105mm
|
Fisheye
|
Good
|
|
|
No
|
|
No
|
12 meg
|
7.6mm
|
good
|
Good high ISO, very small
|
|
S&S DX-1G (8)
|
800 with housing
|
Yes
|
S&S
|
½ inch
|
24-72mm
|
Yes (11)
|
2 dives
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Slow
|
Not used in housing
|
10 meg
|
7.6mm
|
|
Noisy over ISO 100
|
|
S&S DX-2G (9)
|
1000 with housing
|
Yes
|
S&S
|
½ inch
|
24-72mm
|
Yes (11)
|
2 dives
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Good
|
Not used in housing
|
12 meg
|
7.6mm
|
|
Noisy over ISO 100; avail april 2009
|
|
Panasonic LX3
|
417
|
Yes
|
10bar, UK-germany
|
½ inch
|
24-60mm
|
|
|
yes
|
yes
|
Yes
|
|
yes
|
10 meg
|
8.8mm
|
|
|
|
Nikon P6000
|
450 PG
|
Yes
|
Fantasea, ike, Fisheye (seatool)
|
1 inch
|
28-112mm
|
|
|
|
|
yes
|
|
yes
|
13 meg
|
7.4mm
|
|
|
Prices are approximate only, from march, 2009 looking on ebay, google stores, or pricegrabber. Prices are for a reference point only. Prices may be for a refurbished camera for an older model. Prices from “questionable” sellers were not included.
(1) Very subjective answers based on speaking with people. Make sure you use highly rated 2700mAH rechargable double-A batteries like MAHA.
(2) YES means it takes just a regular WA lens; Fisheye means it will also take an INON fisheye lens; maximum field of view is shown if known. You may need a wide-angle lens and a dome port to get maximum angle of coverage.
(3) Adding a WA lens to the canon G10 can be difficult and expensive, because of the way the camera and housings are made. Check with your housing manufacturer to see what is supported at this time. The Fisheye FIX housing has a WA adapter some call “barely WA” for $500 I believe. For $275, you can get an Ikelite dome port that gives you only 28mm of WA coverage. FIX/Fisheye also offers a seperate WA port and fisheye lens with prt for a 130 degree view for a lot more money.
(4) Read this post for a possible add-on lens solution for the canon g9 housing. http://kona-scuba-diving.blogspot.com/2008/06/product-review-canon-g9-with-canon-wp.html
(5) Ikelite and canon housings don’t allow macro or WA lenses at this time, check with your housing manufacturer to see if this changes
(6) TTL with an ike housing doesn’t work in manual mode
(7) Most compacts have problems focusing in low light
(8) Ricoh GX100 inside
(9) Ricoh GX200 inside
(10) Battery life is extended when using strobes like Inon that "quench" the internal flash of the E900 by emitiing a pre-flash
(11) The S&S wide angle lens increased field of view to 85 degrees underwater
dSLR underwater camera selection
There are a large number of dSLR camera bodies out there. The main 3 brands used in UW photography are Nikon, Canon and Olympus. Whichever brand you choose, make sure you are happy with the lens selection that brand supports. Sony and Fuji also make great dSLRs, but those are not yet covered here.
A good lens, proper composition, and proper lighting are important for making great photos. The camera body is less important, and excellent shots can be made with Canon, Nikon, or Olympus bodies. Your photography is unlikely to improve dramatically just by switching camera bodies.
If you choose Canon or Nikon, you will also have to choose between cropped sensor or full frame sensor cameras.
Checking actuations
If your buying used, and your camera uses a mechanical shutter (e.g. - d80,d200) - check the number of actuations (shutter clicks) by getting a jpeg file from the camera and using an exif viewer. You can't check on the camera, so you'll need to bring your laptop and a card reader if you're meeting someone to buy a used camera. Look for "shutter count" or " camera actuations"
- You can get one for the Macintosh here: http://homepage.mac.com/aozer/EV/index.html
- And for the PC here: http://www.opanda.com/en/iexif/index.html
Camera bodies can be further researched here. I personally wouldn't get too hung up about small differences in sensor quality reviews.
Sensor quality reviews:
http://www.dxomark.com/index.php/eng/DxOMark-Sensor/Camera-rankings
General reviews on cameras can be found here:
http://www.dpreview.com/reviews
Here’s some information on various bodies:
Cropped sensor camera:
Nikon D5000 - annouced on April 14th, 12megapixel, hi-def video, same sensor as the D90. It lacks an auto-focus motor. Too bad is doesn't autofocus with 3 of my 4 favorite lenses, just like the D60 and D40. Retail is $730. I'd pass on it, and get a D80/D90 unless you are ok not using a fisheye lens underwater. The nikon 10.5mm and tokina 10-17mm fisheyes won't auto-focus with this camera. I tried out a Nikon d60 once and did not like it at all. If price is an issue go with a used D80/D200 instead.
Nikon D3000 - no auto-focus motor, I'd pass
Nikon D40 or Nikon D60 - No autofocus motor - please see comments on the Nikon D5000 above. very good image quality though. btw, The nikon d40, d40x and d60 can all work in the same housing.
Nikon D300 – Excellent camera and photos. But it’s hard to tell the difference between D80/D200 photos and D300 photos taken underwater. I upgrades to this from the D80 so my wildlife photography could benefit from 1 stop higher ISO.
Nikon D300s - same as D300 + video. Waiting for housings.
Nikon D90 – excellent choice. Sensor rating is even better than the D300. And it does video! Many people are able to use their D90 in a D80 housing, with some slight housing modifications. Nexus and Aquatica housings are popular, and here's a Nauticam D90 underwater housing review.
Nikon D80 – Great camera, great photos. Practically the same sensor as the D200, so you’ll get the same image quality. Get a used housing at a discount.
Nikon D200 – Great camera, great photos. Get a used housing at a discount.
Canon 40d/50d – the Canon 50d fits into the canon 40d housings. A nice surprise for canon 40d owners! Both are excellent choices, especially the Canon 50D.
Canon 7d - looks like a great camera, top choice, great video, housing are coming out now
Olympus E520 – great value; good lens choices at a decent price; housing is a good value too.
Olympus E330 – It might be the only dSLR with useable Live view underwater; some users say the auto-focus is a little slow and has some low light issues
Full frame camera:
Nikon D3 – Excellent camera, but Keep in mind people have been having problems getting the 14-24mm lens sharp. And there is no full-frame equivalent of the Tokina 10-17mm lens.
Canon 5d – wide-angle photos really pop on this camera. Great for topside landscape photos also.
Canon 5d mark II – the specs on this camera look great. photos look excellent. people are just starting to take these underwater (march 2009). UW Results are looking excellent (Oct 2009)
Some personal suggestions:
All 3 manufacturers make excellent products; I'll hesitatingly make a few suggestions:
On a budget? Go for a Olympus or an older Nikon/Canon.
Into macro? Get a Nikon (although great macro shots can be taken with Canon or Oly)
Into wide-angle? Canon 5d takes some great WA shots (but so do the rest).
Really interested in live view underwater? Look into the Oly E330
Looking for the most compact setup? Olympus dSLR in an Olympus housing
What's the hottest bodies out there right now for underwater use? Look at the Nikon D90, Nikon D300 or a Canon 5D mark II, Canon 7D
Cropped-sensor vs Full-frame
Cropped sensor dSLR's are the most popular dSLR's underwater. So who shoots full frame? Generally people who already own a full-frame camera (for indoor sports, weddings, and landscape photography), and want to house it, or pros that have specific shots in mind with a wide-angle lens, often of sharks, dolphins or other pelagics. Professionals who have a requirement to print larger than 20x30 at 300DPI also must sometimes shoot full frame to get the required resolution.
Why did I get a D300? I shoot a lot of telephoto and wildlife topside, so the low-noise and fast frame rate of the D300 was perfect for my topside use. The increased dynamic range will help my WA shots “pop” like those Canon full-frame shots, and the Nikon 60mm and 105mm lens are excellent macro lens.
Crop-sensors advantages
- - Generally considered better for macro, especially for super-macro
- - Approximately 60% more depth of field than a full-frame sensor, given an equivalent field of view
- - Able to use the flexible Tokina 10-17mm fisheye lens to its full benefit
- - For most people, cropped sensors are "good enough"
- -less noise in high ISO (limited use underwater, except in dark conditions shooting ambient light)
- - some cameras have more megapixels for larger prints
- - slightly better IQ and dynamic range for more "pop" in WA and pelagic photos
- - the women go crazy over full-frame cameras
- - better viewfinders
- - potential for higher resolution if you really need it
- - hard to take advantage of the Nikon 14-24mm underwater, because it doesn't take a diopter
- - housing are generally more expensive
- - less depth of field at the same aperture and field of view. You need 1 1/2 stops smaller aperture for equivalent depth of field in a full-frame camera
- - technique, lenses and dome optics all must be much better to take advantage of any increase in resolution
- - more difficult to get good corner sharpeness with wide-angle lenses
Sync Speed and underwater photography
- The faster the sync speed, the easier it will be to light up subjects with your strobe with the sun in the background. With a slower sync speed, you need a small aperture to properly expose the sun, and therefore even stronger strobes.
New or used camera?
Used cameras are fine; just make sure you check the shutter count. Mechanical shutters will eventually fail. The shutter count is also referred to as the number of actuations.
Some of the dSLR Camera Choices:
|
|
Crop factor
|
Megapixels
|
Year released
|
Sync speed
|
Video?
|
|
|
|
Canon 20d
|
1.6
|
8
|
2004
|
1/250th
|
|
|
|
|
Canon 40d
|
1.6
|
10
|
2007
|
1/250th
|
|
|
|
|
Canon 50d
|
1.6
|
15
|
2008
|
1/250th
|
|
|
|
|
Canon 7d
|
1.6
|
18
|
2009
|
1/250th
|
Yes
|
|
|
|
Canon 5d
|
1.0
|
13
|
2005
|
1/200th
|
|
|
|
|
Canon 5D Mark II
|
1.0
|
21
|
2009
|
1/200th
|
Yes
|
|
|
|
Canon EOS 1D mark II
|
1.3
|
8
|
2004
|
1/250th
|
|
|
|
|
Canon EOS 1D mark III
|
1.3
|
10
|
2007
|
1/250th
|
|
|
|
|
Canon EOS 1Ds mark III
|
1.0
|
21
|
2007
|
1/250th
|
|
|
|
|
Canon rebel XTI (400D)
|
1.6
|
10
|
2006
|
1/200th
|
|
|
|
|
Canon rebel T1I (500D)
|
1.6
|
15
|
2009
|
1/200th
|
Yes
|
|
|
|
Nikon d100
|
1.5
|
6
|
2002
|
1/180th
|
|
|
|
|
Nikon d200
|
1.5
|
10
|
2005
|
1/250th
|
|
|
|
|
Nikon d3
|
1
|
12
|
2007
|
1/250th
|
|
|
|
|
Nikon d300
|
1.5
|
12
|
2007
|
1/250th
|
|
|
|
|
Nikon d40
|
1.5
|
6
|
2006
|
1/500th
|
|
|
|
|
Nikon d60
|
1.5
|
10
|
2008
|
1/200th
|
|
|
|
|
Nikon d70S
|
1.5
|
6
|
2005
|
1/500th
|
|
|
|
|
Nikon d700
|
1.0
|
12
|
2008
|
1/250th
|
|
|
|
|
Nikon d80
|
1.5
|
10
|
2006
|
1/200th
|
|
|
|
|
Nikon D90
|
1.5
|
12
|
2008
|
1/200th
|
Yes
|
|
|
|
Oly 330
|
2.0
|
8
|
2006
|
1/180th
|
|
|
|
|
Oly 410
|
2.0
|
10
|
2007
|
1/180th
|
|
|
|
|
Oly 520
|
2.0
|
10
|
2008
|
1/180th
|
|
|
|
|
Oly 620
|
2.0
|
12
|
2009
|
1/180th
|
|
|
|
|
Oly E3
|
2.0
|
10
|
2007
|
1/250th
|
|
|
|
Taking underwater video with a dSLR
The Nikon D90, D5000 and the Canon 5dII can shoot hi-def video, although you must manually focus, and there are other limitations. Although this feature is nowhere near ready to replace dedicated video cameras, this is great for capturing behavior and marine life videos that you couldn’t normally have taken.
Further Reading:
- Underwater camera housings
- Taking care of your underwater camera and housing
- Where and when to take your underwater camera diving
- Understanding camera settings underwater - aperture, shutter speed and more
Thanks for all the great information here!
What wide angle lens would you recommend for a SP 350 in an Ike housing? hey Ron, I'd use an Inon UWL-100 + Inon dome unit with the ikelite 67mm adapter. - scott
I just received the intova Ic800 as a gift how should it be adjusted for the best pics? And is it a decent camera? I have only seen good reveiws. Thanks
CJ - Please read the beginner underwater photographer section
I'm an enthusiastic, albeit not very good photographer. Above sea level I use a Panasonic Lumix FZ28 and wanted something similar underwater. However, after using an Intova LC800 on a Digital Underwater Photography course I bought one! So far I am very happy with the images it (I) can take, and it was much better value than other models. I think that the usefulness of a particular camera really comes down to the skill of the photographer. The most expensive camera you can get won't necessarily take better pictures unless you understand the basics of composition.
What do you think about the Sony - Cyber-shot DSC-W290?
Juan, there's no control over Aperture or Shutter speed (which is helpful for underwater photography), and the reviews say the images are soft, so I think there are better choices. - Scott
Curious to hear thoughts on the Canon S90 for underwater photography. Haven't figured out yet whether there is housing available that allows you to use the rings.
- so far it's looking very good for underwater photography. - Scott
I think there is a BIG difference between D300 and D80/D200 just look at any wide angle picture with the sun in it.
thanks for your input Marcelo. I really don't see a difference, but everyone is entitled to their own opinion. the d300 does have a slightly larger dynamic range, which could show up as small difference in a photo with the sun in it, but I think camera settings and conditions make a larger difference.
with regard to the tokina fisheye in manual mode.
Do you have guidance on the depth of field of the fisheye. if I were to use it in manual focus mode, and "effectively" pre-focus it at close up , or infinity before I went under water -- what would be the depth of field.
I have the D5000, and buying lenses. I love it for land use, but haven't bought a housing yet. ( still waiting). But I'm beginning to wonder if I should have bought the D90 for the AF underwater on more lenses.
Thanks
you can prefocus for a large depth of field, but underwater it's complicated because of dome port optics, read the dome port chapter. normally should You pre-focus underwater, not on the surface
regarding the D5000 vs d90, yes, a nikon dslr camera with an AF-S motor is much more useful for underwater photography, in my opinion.
Post new comment