Macro or supermacro?
Moderators: Critternut, Willie, smb2
3 posts
• Page 1 of 1
It is not for the general interest of this picture but I guess...If this is macro or supermacro.
Shoot in Zeeland The Nederlands , Dive site Dreischor (this week end)

Nikon D60 YS 110a X2, 60mm Macro Nikon, 200 iso, strobe manual (both), 1/125, f: 6.3
Human thinks they're the Earth's owners, it's wrong, we're the Earth property.
Sitting Bull
Sitting Bull
- Alcadhrim
- Posts: 31
- Joined: Wed May 19, 2010 4:20 am
- Location: Belgium
In general macro can be defined as between 1:4 and 1:1. That means that if you make a print (100 x 150 mm) the image is life size or larger. Super macro is anything beyond 1:1. For a 25 mm sensor that means filling the frame with a subject that is smaller than 25 mm long i.e. if you have a 5 mm long nudibranch and it fills a 25 mm sensor you are shooting 5:1 and is supermacro. Your picture to me would appear to be macro not super macro but if the tunicate is a really really small one (like 1 mm tall) then it would be supermacro but I doubt it really is.
Bill
Bill
Bill Van Antwerp Canon/Nauticam/Subal/Inon Lots of glass
Technical Advisor to Bluewater Photo
-

bvanant - Posts: 309
- Joined: Wed May 12, 2010 4:16 pm
- Location: Los Angeles (more or less)
3 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests


